<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><xml><records><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Formation of Acutissimin A in red wine through the contact with cork</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">JOURNAL INTERNATIONAL DES SCIENCES DE LA VIGNE ET DU VIN</style></secondary-title></titles><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2006</style></year></dates><publisher><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">VIGNE ET VIN PUBLICATIONS INT</style></publisher><pub-location><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">42 RUE MARSAN, 33300 BORDEAUX, FRANCE</style></pub-location><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">40</style></volume><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">217-221</style></pages><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">This study shows that when cork material gets in contact with wine, the elagitannins which exist in the cork material (namely one called vescalagin) react with the catechins present in the wine, producing, among others, Acutissimin A, which is an anti-tumoural agent about 250 times more potent than one of the most common anti-cancer drugs clinically used (VP-16). So, the contact of wine samples without the barrel winemaking stage (oak contact) was carried out with cork in order to determine the presence of Acutissimin A. After a contact time of about 30 min, 150 min and 6 days, Acutissimin A was detected in all samples containing cork. In the samples in which the contact was with oak wood, in our conditions, it was not possible to detect Acutissimin A.</style></abstract></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Adsorption of Cations from a Cement Suspension onto Lignocellulosic Substrates and its Influence on Cement Setting</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Journal of Wood Chemistry and Technology</style></secondary-title></titles><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2005</style></year></dates><publisher><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Taylor &amp; Francis</style></publisher><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">25</style></volume><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">231-244</style></pages><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Abstract The calcium (Ca), sodium (Na), and potassium (K) contents of blue gum, maritime pine, and cork increased after these lignocellulosics were stirred with the filtrate of a cement suspension or a solution of calcium hydroxide. The adsorbed cations could be released easily by treatment with an acidic solution. It is suggested that those raw materials, and lignocellulosics in general, act as cation exchange substrates when they are mixed with cement and water to make wood?cement composites. The implications that such phenomena may have on cement hardening reactions, and how they could hinder them are discussed. The possibility that the phenomenon is related to well?known compatibility problems that many woods present when manufacturing wood?cement composites is discussed.</style></abstract><notes><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">doi: 10.1080/02773810500366672</style></notes><research-notes><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">doi: 10.1080/02773810500366672</style></research-notes></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>3</ref-type><contributors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Cork-oak seedling production : Container capacity and substrate effect on seedling field performance</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Nursery production and stand establishment of broad leaves to promote sustainable forest management</style></secondary-title></titles><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">1997</style></year></dates><pub-location><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Rome</style></pub-location><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">171-178</style></pages><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Cork oak is the second forest species in Portugal covering an area of about 721000 ha. In the context of the Common Agriculture Policy (CAP), large areas (ca. 10% of total area) were reforested between 1994-98 with low survival rates due to inappropriate nursery and establishment techniques, as well as the use of unsuitable genetic material. The main purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of container capacity and substrate in field performance of cork oak seedling with 1 year of age during the first 3 years after plantation. Therefore 3 container capacities were tested (210, 300 and 400 cm3) in combination with 4 types of substrate: composted pine bark, composted pine bark with vermiculite 3:1(v/v), composted pine bark with peat 1:1 (v/v) and peat with vermiculite 3:1 (v/v). With the 300 cm3 container capacity 3 other substrates were also tested: F+H organic layers, F+H organic layers with composted pine bark 1:1 (v/v) and F+H organic layers with peat 1:1 (v/v). A field trial was established in the South of Portugal in April 1998. Just before plantation seedlings morphological characteristics (root and shoot biomass, leaf area, height, stem diameter, root length and root development patterns) were measured and correlated with survival and growth evaluated one, two and three years after plantation. The results showed that after three years in the field only the type of substrate had a highly significant influence in survival and early growth. Container capacity (210, 300 and 400 cm_) did not have an influence on height growth during the first 3 years, just as there was no clear influence on survival rate. Peat with vermiculite (3:1) substrate led to 30% higher survivals than other substrates. Substrate with peat favoured secondary root development (length), which seems to be an advantage in field performance.</style></abstract></record></records></xml>