<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><xml><records><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Campos, Pablo</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Oviedo, Jose L</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Caparros, Alejandro</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Huntsinger, Lynn</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Coelho, Inocencio</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Contingent Valuation of Woodland-Owner Private Amenities in Spain, Portugal, and California.</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Rangeland Ecology &amp; Management</style></secondary-title></titles><keywords><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">agroforestry systems</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">environmental economics</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">environmental services</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Mediterranean woodlands</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">private ownership</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Stated Preferences</style></keyword></keywords><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2009</style></year></dates><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">62</style></volume><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">240-252</style></pages><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Most of the Mediterranean woodlands in Spain, Portugal, and California are managed as agrosilvopastoral enterprises, producing some combination of livestock, wood, cork products, and crops, as well as wildlife habitat and diverse environmental services. Private amenity benefits to landowners have been suggested as an explanation for high land prices and the persistence of such rangeland enterprises despite apparently marginal cash returns. In this study, private amenity values are estimated using a contingent valuation technique in surveys of private woodland owners as part of five case studies, using a design developed to separate landowner amenity income and capital values. Nonindustrial private landowners were asked about the maximum amount of money that they were willing to give up (to pay) before selling their property to invest in more commercially profitable assets, and the proportion of the market price of their woodland that they think is explained by privately consumed amenities. Amenity values were found to be relevant because, in all cases, landowners were willing to pay &gt;€120 · ha−1 · yr−1, at 2002 prices, and attributed &gt; 30% of land market price to amenities. These values represent an amenity profitability rate &gt; 2% in all case studies. The data analysis shows some similarities, but mostly divergences, in the different land-simulated and amenity-simulated markets.</style></abstract></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Campos, Pablo</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Daly-Hassen, Hamed</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Oviedo, Jose L</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Ovando, Paola</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Chebil, Ali</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Accounting for single and aggregated forest incomes: Application to public cork oak forests in Jerez (Spain) and Iteimia (Tunisia)</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Ecological Economics</style></secondary-title></titles><keywords><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Agroforestry accounting system</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Cork Oak Forest</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Household economic rationality</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Public ownership</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Total commercial income</style></keyword></keywords><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2008</style></year></dates><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">65</style></volume><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">76-86</style></pages><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">This study presents an applied improvement in the agroforestry accounting system (AAS) approach to two public cork oak forests in the Mediterranean region: Jerez (Spain) and Iteimia (Tunisia). Both forests have similar environments but differ in land property rights, labour markets and countries (developed and developing economy, respectively). The income analysis considers the differences between forest ownership, and household and landowner economic rationalities. In the case of Jerez, the public landowner has a right to exclude others from using the forest resources; community employment and natural resource conservation criteria determine Jerez's management. In the Iteimia case, the public landowner has regulated free-use rights for livestock grazing, firewood and crops so that local households can meet their needs and improve their income. Households operate by maximizing their income from the full employment of their own family workforce. The results show that Jerez's management generates negative commercial capital income for the public landowner, despite receiving significant public subsidies, while it maintains high internal forestry investment that generates additional local employment. Conversely, Iteimia produces positive commercial capital income for the public landowner and high household self-employed labour income per hectare.</style></abstract></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Caparros, Alejandro</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Oviedo, Jose L</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Campos, Pablo</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Would you choose your preferred option? Comparing choice and recoded ranking experiments</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">AMERICAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS</style></secondary-title></titles><keywords><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">choice modeling</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">conjoint analysis</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">cork oak reforestation</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">environmental preferences</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">recoded ranking</style></keyword></keywords><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2008</style></year></dates><publisher><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">BLACKWELL PUBLISHING</style></publisher><pub-location><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">9600 GARSINGTON RD, OXFORD OX4 2DQ, OXON, ENGLAND</style></pub-location><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">90</style></volume><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">843-855</style></pages><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Previous research has shown that results from a choice experiment are statistically different from those obtained from a ranking experiment that is recoded and treated as a choice experiment using only the first rank. By avoiding some of the shortcomings of previous comparisons, we obtain the opposite results using data from the valuation of a cork oak reforestation program in the south of Spain. Structural models and welfare estimations are statistically indistinguishable irrespective of the use of parametric or bootstrapping tests. Further, we employ follow-up questions and subsample analysis to test whether divergences appear when potential effects are isolated.</style></abstract></record></records></xml>