<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><xml><records><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Campos, Pablo</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Ovando, Paola</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Montero, Gregorio</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Does private income support sustainable agroforestry in Spanish dehesa?</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Land Use Policy</style></secondary-title></titles><keywords><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Amenities</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">environmental services</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Monte</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Oak silviculture</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Rural development policy</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Total income</style></keyword></keywords><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2008</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2008///</style></date></pub-dates></dates><urls><web-urls><url><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0264837707000889</style></url></web-urls></urls><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">25</style></volume><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">510 - 522</style></pages><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Oak woodland dehesa suffers from the aging of trees without a natural regeneration of young oaks coming in to replace them. Recent European Union (EU) policy reforms for rural development focus on supporting multifunctional agriculture that complies with the EU’s environmental goals, such as mitigating biodiversity losses and climate change. Such reforms could result in government support for natural woodland regeneration practices in European agroforestry systems, which are recognized for providing valuable environmental services. Managing dehesa cork oak and holm oak woodlands to stimulate the growth of new oaks could be an efficient option for maintaining, and even increasing, the dehesa’s current carbon stock and biodiversity. Here we develop and apply a new agroforestry accounting system based on the concept of Hicksian income to a dehesa in the Monfragu¨ e area of western Spain, using primary microeconomic data from a large case study. Private total income and profitability rates are measured for individual goods and services, and for the entire dehesa in a steady state. Our application extends the EU system of accounts for agriculture and forestry by including private amenity consumption by landowners and the gain or loss in human-made and natural capital. We compare an actual typical unsustainable woodland management scenario with an ideal sustainable management scenario in which there is a continuous regeneration and recruitment of holm and cork oaks as predicted by silvicultural models. The results show that, given current land use policy incentives, allowing a slow depletion of oak trees is more profitable for a dehesa private landowner than maintaining the dehesa’s trees. As a result many dehesa environmental services are gradually lost. This market failure requires new land use policies that induce private land owners to invest in the renewal of aging oak woodlands. To evaluate the impacts of this new policy, we show how private landowner income is affected when changes are made to achieve sustainable management of dehesa oaks. More research is needed in order to understand how the dehesa’s landowner market income and private amenities trade-off can affect the owner’s land use preferences and decisions.</style></abstract><issue><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">4</style></issue></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Campos, P.</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Rodriguez, Y.</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Caparros, A.</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Towards the dehesa total income accounting: theory and operative Monfragüe study cases</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Investigación Agraria: Sistemas y Recursos Forestales</style></secondary-title></titles><keywords><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Commercial income</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Dehesa</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Environmental income</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Forestland accounting</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Total income</style></keyword></keywords><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2001</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2001///</style></date></pub-dates></dates><urls><web-urls><url><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">http://digital.csic.es/handle/10261/10285</style></url></web-urls></urls><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">10</style></volume><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">43 - 67</style></pages><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">There has been, from the beginning of the 1970s, a controversial debate on the income measurement of natural resource exploitation and sustainability both commercial and environmental of their economic resources. Treeless pastures and woodlands have been the focus of less research than has timber forestland. Up to today, institutional timber forestland accounting proposals have not integrated non-excludable and other non-market benefits into total income measurement of forestland. This paper shows a complete accounting system that can incorporate any economic benefit and cost that could accrue from active and passive uses of forestland, whether or not the economic effects are the result of on-site and off-site land uses. An application to the Spanish dehesas at Monfragüe area gives a tentative total income measurement under this new accounting proposal. The dehesa woodland study represents one of the most complex forestland uses system.</style></abstract><issue><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">3</style></issue></record></records></xml>