<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><xml><records><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Denman, S</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Kirk, S</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Whybrow, A</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Orton, E</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Webber, J F</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Phytophthora kernoviae and P. ramorum: host susceptibility and sporulation potential on foliage of susceptible trees1</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">EPPO Bulletin</style></secondary-title></titles><keywords><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">host tree</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Phytophthora kernoviae</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Phytophthora ramorum</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">resistance</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">sporulation potential (voyant)</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">susceptibility</style></keyword></keywords><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2006</style></year></dates><publisher><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Blackwell Publishing Ltd</style></publisher><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">36</style></volume><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">373-376</style></pages><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Phytophthora kernoviae and P. ramorum are introduced, invasive pathogens in the UK. Both species are adapted for aerial dispersion and have a wide host range, many of which are common to both pathogens. The diseases they cause are foliar necrosis and shoot tip dieback on both tree and ornamental hosts, and bleeding cankers on tree hosts. Inoculum is produced on infected foliage but not on bleeding cankers in both cases. Proactive measures to prevent disease spread and to evaluate the risks posed by these pathogens are being undertaken. Amongst others, these include using the detached leaf assay to get an indication of tree foliage susceptibility, and inoculating wounded stems of saplings to get an idea of under-canopy sapling and nursery tree susceptibility. The sporulation potential on selected susceptible hosts was assessed, and finally, surveys which are still ongoing were carried out in south-west England. Results of this work are presented and discussed.</style></abstract></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Denman, S.</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Kirk, S.</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Whybrow, A.</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Orton, E.</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Webber, J. F.</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Phytophthora kernoviae and P. ramorum: host susceptibility and sporulation potential on foliage of susceptible trees1</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">EPPO Bulletin</style></secondary-title></titles><keywords><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">host tree</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Phytophthora kernoviae</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Phytophthora ramorum</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">resistance</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">sporulation potential (voyant)</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">susceptibility</style></keyword></keywords><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2006</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2006///</style></date></pub-dates></dates><urls><web-urls><url><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">http://doi.wiley.com/10.1111/j.1365-2338.2006.01014.xhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2338.2006.01014.x</style></url></web-urls></urls><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">36</style></volume><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">373 - 376</style></pages><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Phytophthora kernoviae and P. ramorum are introduced, invasive pathogens in the UK. Both species are adapted for aerial dispersion and have a wide host range, many of which are common to both pathogens. The diseases they cause are foliar necrosis and shoot tip dieback on both tree and ornamental hosts, and bleeding cankers on tree hosts. Inoculum is produced on infected foliage but not on bleeding cankers in both cases. Proactive measures to prevent disease spread and to evaluate the risks posed by these pathogens are being undertaken. Amongst others, these include using the detached leaf assay to get an indication of tree foliage susceptibility, and inoculating wounded stems of saplings to get an idea of under-canopy sapling and nursery tree susceptibility. The sporulation potential on selected susceptible hosts was assessed, and finally, surveys which are still ongoing were carried out in south-west England. Results of this work are presented and discussed.</style></abstract><issue><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2</style></issue><notes><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">The following values have no corresponding Zotero field:&lt;br/&gt;publisher: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</style></notes></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">De Roman, Miriam</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Clavería, Vanessa</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Maria De Miguel, Ana</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">A revision of the descriptions of ectomycorrhizas published since 1961</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Mycological Research</style></secondary-title></titles><keywords><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">descriptions</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Ectomycorrhizae</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">habitat (PG)</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">host tree</style></keyword></keywords><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2005</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2005///</style></date></pub-dates></dates><urls><web-urls><url><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0953756208602324</style></url></web-urls></urls><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">109</style></volume><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">1063 - 1104</style></pages><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">All available publications providing descriptions of ectomycorrhizas (ECM) were reviewed in order to build a database containing details on fungus forming the ECM, host tree, country where the material for description was collected, and habitat of the ECM. Other secondary data were also recorded. In all 1244 descriptions of ECM published since 1961 in 479 papers were reviewed. The number of diﬀerent ECM morphotypes described was 814. Most ECM described were collected in Europe and North America. Gymnosperms were the most common tree associates, and boreal and temperate forests the most studied ecosystems. Fungal symbionts were mostly Basidiomycota, epigeous, and with mushroom-like morphology. The paper also addresses the gaps in ECM knowledge that mycorrhizologists should address in future studies.</style></abstract><issue><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">10</style></issue></record></records></xml>