<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><xml><records><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">SERRANO, M S</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">DE VITA, P</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">CARBONERO, M D</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Fernández, F</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">FERNÁNDEZ-REBOLLO, P</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">SÁNCHEZ, M E</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Susceptibility to Phytophthora cinnamomi of the commonest morphotypes of Holm oak in southern Spain</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Forest Pathology</style></secondary-title></titles><keywords><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">holm oak morphotypes (voyant)</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">phytophthora cinnamomi</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">root symptoms</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">susceptibility</style></keyword></keywords><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2012</style></year></dates><publisher><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Blackwell Publishing Ltd</style></publisher><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">42</style></volume><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">345-347</style></pages><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">The four main morphotypes of Holm oak (Quercus ilex subsp. ballota) present in Andalusia (expansa, macrocarpa, microcarpa and rotundifolia) were infected with Phytophthora cinnamomi to determine their susceptibility to the root pathogen. No large differences were found among the four morphotypes in the infection of roots, which always showed a high degree of necrosis. However, the different responses of the foliage to infection separated the four morphotypes of Holm oak into three groups: very susceptible (microcarpa), susceptible (expansa) and moderately susceptible (rotundifolia and macrocarpa). The natural hybrid Q. ilex ballota–Q. faginea exhibited a low level of root and foliar symptoms when infected with P. cinnamomi. Quercus faginea could be considered as a source of resistance to P. cinnamomi in future breeding programmes.</style></abstract></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Denman, S.</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Kirk, S.</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Whybrow, A.</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Orton, E.</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Webber, J. F.</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Phytophthora kernoviae and P. ramorum: host susceptibility and sporulation potential on foliage of susceptible trees1</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">EPPO Bulletin</style></secondary-title></titles><keywords><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">host tree</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Phytophthora kernoviae</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Phytophthora ramorum</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">resistance</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">sporulation potential (voyant)</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">susceptibility</style></keyword></keywords><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2006</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2006///</style></date></pub-dates></dates><urls><web-urls><url><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">http://doi.wiley.com/10.1111/j.1365-2338.2006.01014.xhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2338.2006.01014.x</style></url></web-urls></urls><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">36</style></volume><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">373 - 376</style></pages><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Phytophthora kernoviae and P. ramorum are introduced, invasive pathogens in the UK. Both species are adapted for aerial dispersion and have a wide host range, many of which are common to both pathogens. The diseases they cause are foliar necrosis and shoot tip dieback on both tree and ornamental hosts, and bleeding cankers on tree hosts. Inoculum is produced on infected foliage but not on bleeding cankers in both cases. Proactive measures to prevent disease spread and to evaluate the risks posed by these pathogens are being undertaken. Amongst others, these include using the detached leaf assay to get an indication of tree foliage susceptibility, and inoculating wounded stems of saplings to get an idea of under-canopy sapling and nursery tree susceptibility. The sporulation potential on selected susceptible hosts was assessed, and finally, surveys which are still ongoing were carried out in south-west England. Results of this work are presented and discussed.</style></abstract><issue><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2</style></issue><notes><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">The following values have no corresponding Zotero field:&lt;br/&gt;publisher: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</style></notes></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Denman, S</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Kirk, S</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Whybrow, A</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Orton, E</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Webber, J F</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Phytophthora kernoviae and P. ramorum: host susceptibility and sporulation potential on foliage of susceptible trees1</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">EPPO Bulletin</style></secondary-title></titles><keywords><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">host tree</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Phytophthora kernoviae</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Phytophthora ramorum</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">resistance</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">sporulation potential (voyant)</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">susceptibility</style></keyword></keywords><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2006</style></year></dates><publisher><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Blackwell Publishing Ltd</style></publisher><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">36</style></volume><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">373-376</style></pages><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Phytophthora kernoviae and P. ramorum are introduced, invasive pathogens in the UK. Both species are adapted for aerial dispersion and have a wide host range, many of which are common to both pathogens. The diseases they cause are foliar necrosis and shoot tip dieback on both tree and ornamental hosts, and bleeding cankers on tree hosts. Inoculum is produced on infected foliage but not on bleeding cankers in both cases. Proactive measures to prevent disease spread and to evaluate the risks posed by these pathogens are being undertaken. Amongst others, these include using the detached leaf assay to get an indication of tree foliage susceptibility, and inoculating wounded stems of saplings to get an idea of under-canopy sapling and nursery tree susceptibility. The sporulation potential on selected susceptible hosts was assessed, and finally, surveys which are still ongoing were carried out in south-west England. Results of this work are presented and discussed.</style></abstract></record></records></xml>